•   Research and Development Skills ANA001HH1AE-3013 13.01.2025-14.03.2025  5   (LIE4VIA, ...) +-
    Learning objectives
    A student who has completed this course or acquired similar competence is able, in his/her own thesis or in other development project:

    • gather relevant information and critically evaluate sources and reliability of the information
    • describe the research process in a matter-of-fact and structured way and mark the sources appropriately
    • use a method suitable for one's own thesis or project to gather and analyse data and working life information
    • justify the choices made and make concrete development proposals
    • apply ethical principles at all stages of one's own research or development work
    • develop a topic for one’s own thesis
    • identify the method options needed to complete one's thesis, and recognize the stages of Haaga-Helia's thesis process.
    Starting level and linkage with other courses
    The course precedes the Bachelor´s thesis. During or after the course, the student registers for the thesis process in the Wihi-system.
    Contents
    Please see the learning targets. More detailed information of the content can be found in the implementation descriptions.
    Assessment criteria
    Assessment criteria - grade 1
    When the implementation type of the course is CONTACT, ONLINE or BLENDED it is required that the student is present during those teaching hours that are marked in the study schedule. If you are absent more than 25 %, your grade will be lowered by one. If you are absent more than 50 %, the course is failed.

    Assessment criteria - grade 1

    The student
    - Is able to find sources necessary for development and research work and masters reference techniques.
    - Is able to write a research and development plan.
    - Recognizes different research methods and ethical questions related to research work.
    Assessment criteria - grade 3
    Assessment criteria - grade 3

    The student (in addition to the previous)
    - Is able to choose and apply suitable methods for gathering working life information.
    - Can analyse information and data, and justify one’s choices.
    - Can describe the research process and suggest concrete development proposals.
    Assessment criteria - grade 5
    Assessment criteria - grade 5

    The student (in addition to the previous)
    - Is able to critically assess the reliability of information, analyses and research.
    - Can apply ethical principles throughout one’s research and development work.
    - Is able to assess development proposals and their implementation in working life.

    Teaching methods and instruction

    Contact teaching: lectures, workshops, group and individual assigments

    Responsible person

    Teemu Lehmusto

    Learning material and recommended literature

    Course materials
    Suplementary reading: Title: Research methods for sports studies / Ian Jones.
    Description: Fourth edition. | Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge, 2022.

    Campus

    Vierumäki Campus

    Teaching language

    English

    Timing

    13.01.2025 - 14.03.2025

    Learning assignments

    Task #1 Search in Theseus University of Applied Sciences interesting AMK thesis in the field of sports coaching and management. Get to know the structure of the thesis. Also check out the Bachelors thesis instructions found on Haaga-Helia's student website Thesis, Bachelor degree | Haaga-Helia. Familiarize yourself with the evaluation criteria and mirror them in your chosen thesis. Make notes for yourself and get ready to present in the next upcoming meeting. (Return the notes to Moodle no later than): • The topic of your chosen thesis • What was/was the aim of the thesis? • What was achieved? • What would you raise in light of the evaluation criteria? Download the citation program Mendeley for yourself. The instructions can be found in the LibGuide welcome - Haaga-Helia LibGuides - LibGuides at Haaga-Helia University of Applied Sciences. Collect a few interesting and different sources for yourself there (research articles, books, etc.) Assignment evaluation: Pass/Fail TASK #2 The goal of the learning assignment is to practice using databases, reading an article, and promoting your own thesis process. In the task, you must search for two articles in databases based on your thesis, work or other learning tasks. Both articles must be scientific, peer-reviewed articles. Evaluate article reliability using LibGuides. Different theses cannot be used. You can find more information on search instructions at the LibGuides link. Based on reading the articles, make a report in which you discuss the following: In the report, use the word template for writing a report, the length of the report is 2-3 pages, including both articles. You can find the reporting template under the student pages of Haaga-Helia's website. • Report and describe your search for information, which databases you used, which searches you made, how many hits you got, how you expanded/narrowed your search, and how you ended up with the articles you selected. • Describe how you assess the reliability of the articles. • What were the articles like in comparison to other articles/other texts/experience information you read on the topic? What do you think are the most relevant points of convergence? What was new in these articles? • What were the most significant findings of the articles? What kind of conclusions have the authors of the articles made? How can you use this information in practice/ in your own thesis, work, etc.? • What did you miss about the contents of the articles? • Make a bibliography and citations using Mendeley. Return your report to this task return platform no later than ??? The reports are evaluated numerically from 1-5. Task #3 Thesis topic proposal in a PPT or PDF format. Include the introduction of the topic and highlight its significance in the field, 3-5 articles/books/book chapters for theoretical background (and reference those according to the guidelines provided earlier) and the type of the thesis and reasons behind it.

    Enrollment

    02.01.2025 - 10.01.2025

    Content scheduling

    Thesis Process (Mika)

    Reporting Guidelines (Mikko)

    Referencing (Vladi & Mikko)

    Ethical Principles (Vladi)

    Qualitative Research (Vladi)

    Quantitative Research (Vladi)

    Topic Proposal (Mika, V., Vladi & Mikko + Markus, Mika S., Tomi)

    Groups
    • LIE4VIA
    • CONTACT
    Teachers

    Mika Vähälummukka

    Seats

    15 - 30

    Further information

    This course is assessed 0-5 based on the assignments.

    Degree Programme

    COACH Sports Coaching and Management

    R&D proportion

    0.00 cr

    Virtual proportion

    0.00 cr

    Evaluation scale

    H-5